https://www.selleckchem.com/products/vtp50469.html Background The Advanced Practice Pharmacist (APh) licensure has provided an opportunity for pharmacists to expand their scope of practice in California; however, there have not been any studies in California assessing the interventions made by APhs as credentialed providers of care. Objective To assess the clinical interventions made by APhs as credentialed providers with clinical privileges in an independent community pharmacy. Methods This was a retrospective, observational study that assessed clinical interventions made by APhs on patients referred for disease state management between January 2018 and December 2018. Pharmacist interventions were stratified into 3 levels of provider care full privilege (FP), limited privilege (LP), and no privilege. Results FP had the highest percentage of accepted recommendations (62.2% ± 20.1%), whereas LP and no privilege had lower percentages of accepted recommendations (41.9% ± 12.0% and 31.6% ± 3.7%, respectively) (P less then 0.01). Conclusion APhs as credentialed providers with FP, or even LP, made more successful clinical interventions than those without any privileges.Background Most immunization rates fall below the Healthy People 2020 goals for adults. Pharmacists have the potential to have a positive effect on immunization rates through vaccine administration. Objective The purpose of this study was to assess if an educational program developed for pharmacists could increase pharmacist-delivered statewide immunization rates. Practice description This study was conducted in the state of North Dakota. North Dakota law allows authorized pharmacists to provide any immunization to individuals aged 11 years or older. Practice innovation In collaboration with the state health department, a needs assessment of North Dakota pharmacists was conducted to determine what resources and education could increase the delivery of immunizations within the pharmacy. The results were used