001), and other factors such as language ( < .001) and interaction term of language and education ( < .05) were also shown to be influential in the general level of trust. Further examinations of how group membership influences reported trust levels in health-care professionals in Kazakhstan are warranted. Such studies would be beneficial if trust in health-care professionals is to be understood and improved in order to achieve more desirable health outcomes. Further examinations of how group membership influences reported trust levels in health-care professionals in Kazakhstan are warranted. Such studies would be beneficial if trust in health-care professionals is to be understood and improved in order to achieve more desirable health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine how wait time duration is associated with patient satisfaction and how appointment characteristics relate to wait time duration and patient satisfaction in the orthopedic surgery clinic. Two hundred sixty-four patients visiting one of 3 ambulatory orthopedic surgery clinics were asked to estimate their wait time and to rate their satisfaction with the visit. The associations between appointment characteristics, wait time, and satisfaction were analyzed using tests, 1-way analysis of variance, and Pearson correlation coefficients. Wait times were significantly different based on visit type, appointment time, whether an X-ray was required, and whether a trainee was involved ( < .001). Patients with wait times less than 30 minutes had higher satisfaction scores ( < .001). Satisfaction ratings were significantly different based on the surgeon's management recommendation ( = .0211), but were not significantly different based on sex, age, office location, visit type, appointment time subsection, or time spent with the physician ( > .05). Wait times negatively correlated with satisfaction. New patient visits, appointment times in the later third of the day, appointments requiring an X-ray, and appointments involving a trainee had significantly longer wait times. Care should be taken to inform patients with visits involving these characteristics that they may experience longer than average wait times. Wait times negatively correlated with satisfaction. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/oicr-9429.html New patient visits, appointment times in the later third of the day, appointments requiring an X-ray, and appointments involving a trainee had significantly longer wait times. Care should be taken to inform patients with visits involving these characteristics that they may experience longer than average wait times. In order to provide patient center care, our multiple sclerosis (MS) clinic assesses patient concerns before clinical encounters, first by asking the optional qualitative question "What is the most important thing you what your health-care provider to know today" (most important concern of the patient [MIPC]) and then completing quantitative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL). Both sets of questions are designed to facilitate encounters that address patients' values and preferences. Determine whether the qualitative MIPC responses provided unique information not included in PROMs or clinical assessments. We randomly selected 400 first-time MIPC responders and 400 first-time MIPC nonresponders from 2788 participants in our database. We categorized MIPC responses by content and number of unique concerns and appended them to the Neuro-QoL framework. Nonresponders were compared to those who provided 1 and 2 or more responses. Several My to share specific concerns with their providers.Staff and provider engagement leads to better quality and experience of care and less turnover and burnout. In this program, we describe an approach to better understand underlying factors that lead to low staff and provider engagement and address such factors by creating actionable plans that drive improved engagement measures. Focus groups were conducted with staff, advance practice providers, and faculty to better understand low scored areas in an annual third-party engagement survey. Focus group results were analyzed, and thematic action plans were then developed by a leadership team. These plans and the status of addressing the identified issues were published and disseminated back to all staff and providers using a "stoplight report." The leadership team met every 2 to 4 weeks until all issues were addressed and communicated back to the department. The subsequent year's engagement scores statistically increased across all engagement score domains for both staff and faculty. We conclude that using a qualitative approach to understanding low-scored engagement domains will allow a deeper and authentic understanding of the root factors that drive low engagement scores. This approach allows teams to develop responsive action plans, resulting in higher engagement scores, which will eventually lead to better service and care to patients. Limited research is available around patient experience of integrated behavioral health care in primary care settings. We sought to identify the major themes through which patients described their integrated behavioral health care experiences as a means of informing and improving clinic processes of integrated health care delivery. We captured viewpoints from 16 patients who experienced an integrated behavioral health care model from 2 primary care clinics and completed at least 3 visits with a behavioral health provider (BHP). Using grounded theory analyses, we coded and analyzed transcriptions for emergent themes. The interview process yielded 3 major themes related to the BHP including (a) the BHPs' clinic presence made behavioral health care more convenient and accessible, (b) BHPs worked within time and program limitations, and (c) BHPs helped with coping, wellness, and patient-care team communication. The BHPs serving in a large primary care practice and a Federally Qualified Health Center played an important role in connecting patients with behavioral health care and improving care team collaboration, both in terms of communication within the team and between the team and the patient/family. The BHPs serving in a large primary care practice and a Federally Qualified Health Center played an important role in connecting patients with behavioral health care and improving care team collaboration, both in terms of communication within the team and between the team and the patient/family.