Atrial fibrillation (AF) can be secondary to acute pulmonary embolism (PE). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of new-onset AF on patients with acute PE. In this study, 4,288 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with acute PE were retrospectively screened. In total, 77 patients with acute PE and new-onset AF were analyzed. Another 154 acute PE patients without AF were selected as the age- and sex-matched control group. Adverse in-hospital outcome comprised one of the following conditions all-cause death, endotracheal intubation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and intravenous catecholamine therapy. The patients with new-onset AF had higher prevalence of congestive heart failure, higher simplified PE severity index (sPESI), higher creatinine, and larger left atrium diameter. The incidences of adverse in-hospital outcomes were 10.4 and 2.6% in patients with new-onset AF and no AF, respectively (p = 0.02).  https://www.selleckchem.com/products/iso-1.html  Patients with sPESI ≥ 1 had higher incidence of adverse in-hospital outcomes than those with sPESI = 0 (9.4 vs. 0.9%, p  less then  0.01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of sPESI and sPESI + AF (adding 1 point for new-onset AF) scores in assessing the adverse in-hospital outcome were 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.93) and 0.84 (95% CI 0.72-0.96), respectively. In multivariable analysis, sPESI ≥ 1 (odds ratio, 8.88; 95% CI 1.10-72.07; p = 0.04) was an independent predictor of adverse in-hospital outcome. However, new-onset AF was not an independent predictor. In the population studied, sPESI is an independent predictor of adverse in-hospital outcomes, whereas new-onset AF following acute PE is not, but it may add predictive value to sPESI.
   Improvement in quality of life (QOL) and patient satisfaction after endoscopic thoracic sympathotomy (ETS) in patients with primary hyperhidrosis may be affected by various factors. We examined whether the preoperative sweating severity of primary hyperhidrosis sites affects postoperative results.
 
   The records of 112 patients who underwent bilateral ETS were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into three groups according to the sweating severity score obtained from all primary hyperhidrosis sites (primary hyperhidrosis severity score [PHSS]) and analyzed comparatively. Group A (PHSS = 1-4) included 22 patients, Group B (PHSS = 5-8) 36 patients, and Group C (PHSS ≥ 9) 54 patients. Outcome measures included QOL prior to surgery, improvement in QOL after surgery, degree of clinical improvement, presence, severity, localization, and site number of reflex sweating (RS) and general patient satisfaction after 6 months of surgery.
 
   The preoperative QOL of patients with higher PHSS (groups B, C) was worse than other patients (group A). More than 91% of all patients had any level improvement in QOL, and over 96% had slight or great clinical improvement. RS developed in 80% of the patients, mostly in the back, very severe in 8%, and in median two different body areas. The overall patient satisfaction rate was more than 95%. There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of all postoperative results.
 
   Preoperative sweating severity of primary hyperhidrosis sites does not affect post-sympathotomy results. Surgeons should not be worried when deciding upon surgery, even in patients with high sweating severity.
  Preoperative sweating severity of primary hyperhidrosis sites does not affect post-sympathotomy results. Surgeons should not be worried when deciding upon surgery, even in patients with high sweating severity.
   Over the years, open heart surgery has become more complex, and especially reoperative surgery, more demanding. The risk of third-time or more sternotomy procedures is unclear.
 
   We reviewed our institutional experience of 25 years based on two generations of cardiac surgeons in a German university medical center to document frequency, outcome, and complications of the various types of open heart procedures.
 
   Overall, we included 104 patients with a mean age of 64 ± 13 years. The EuroSCORE II (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) calculated an average mortality risk of 15.7 ± 15.4%. Subgroup comparison of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve replacement, and mitral valve replacement procedures did not delineate significantly different risk profiles except for the incidence of acute myocardial infarction, which was present in every second patient (53.3%) scheduled for CABG surgery. The time interval to previous surgery was 4.7 ± 6.3 years on average. Most frequent surgical procedures were valve operations, which were accomplished in 72 patients (69.2%), whereas coronary bypass surgery was performed in 23 patients (22.1%) only. Combined procedures were performed in 27 patients. Complex aortic arch replacement with a frozen elephant trunk procedure was necessary in six patients. Overall, 30-day survival was 81.7%.
 
   In conclusion, third-time and more sternotomy procedures offer acceptable outcome and should therefore be considered in appropriate patients.
  In conclusion, third-time and more sternotomy procedures offer acceptable outcome and should therefore be considered in appropriate patients.Despite advances in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction with subsequent mortality reduction, which are mainly caused by the early timing of revascularization, cardiogenic shock still remains the leading cause of death with mortality rates still approaching 40 to 50%. Cardiogenic shock is characterized by a multiorgan dysfunction syndrome, often complicated by a systemic inflammatory response syndrome that affects the outcome more than the reduction of the cardiac contractile function. However, both European and American guidelines on myocardial infarction focus on interventional or surgical aspects only. Therefore, experts from eight German and Austrian specialty societies including the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery published the German-Austrian S3 guideline "cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment" to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of infarction-related cardiogenic shock in 2010 covering the topics of early revascularization, revascularization techniques, intensive care unit treatment including ventilation, transfusion regimens, adjunctive medical therapy, and mechanical support devices.